Understanding Grounds for Trademark Application Rejection in India

Explore key reasons for application rejection under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and tips to navigate the process successfully.

Understanding Grounds for Trademark Application Rejection in India

Learn why trademark applications get rejected and how to avoid it under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Companiesinn

Created: 1st July, 2025 9:39 AM, last update:1st July, 2025 9:51 AM


Introduction

Trademark registration is crucial for protecting your brand identity and ensuring exclusive rights to your trademark. However, the process is not infallible, and many applications face rejection by the Trademark Registry in India. Understanding the common grounds for rejection can help applicants avoid delays and legal challenges. Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, trademarks can be refused registration based on absolute and relative grounds.

The Trade Marks Act, 1999, governs the registration of trademarks in India, aiming to protect trademarks while preventing unfair competition and consumer deception. Key sections relevant to application rejection include Section 9 (Absolute Grounds) and Section 11 (Relative Grounds).

Absolute Grounds for Refusal (Section 9)

Absolute grounds relate to the inherent nature of the trademark, disregarding existing trademarks.

  • Lack of Distinctiveness: Trademarks that are generic, descriptive, or commonplace (e.g., "Fresh" for vegetables) are inherently non-distinctive and typically refused.

  • Descriptive Marks: Marks that directly describe the goods or services (e.g., "Sweet" for chocolates) cannot be registered unless they have acquired distinctiveness through use.

  • Deceptive or Confusing Marks: Marks that mislead regarding the nature, quality, or geographical origin of goods or services face rejection.

  • Offensive Marks: Marks containing obscene, scandalous, or religiously offensive material are prohibited.

  • Prohibited Symbols: Use of certain emblems or names, such as the Ashoka Chakra or Mahatma Gandhi, is restricted under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.

Relative Grounds for Refusal (Section 11)

Relative grounds are concerned with potential conflicts with existing trademarks.

  • Similarity with Existing Trademarks: Marks identical or deceptively similar to existing ones in the same class are likely to be refused.

  • Likelihood of Confusion: Even non-identical but phonetically, visually, or conceptually similar marks can be rejected if they likely confuse the public.

How to Avoid Rejection

  • Conduct a thorough trademark search to ensure no existing conflicts.

  • Avoid using generic or merely descriptive terms.

  • Create a unique, coined term for your trademark.

  • Consult with a trademark expert to ensure correct filing procedures and compliance with legal standards.

Conclusion

Rejection of a trademark application is a common hurdle that can often be avoided. By opting for a strong, distinct, and compliant trademark from the onset, businesses can enhance their potential for successful registration, securing substantial brand protection in the long run.